Voices from the Foundations: Life in the EYs



I am a teacher. I have been teaching EYs for over 15 years.




There is change ahead always and I know that we are expecting some early years reforms in TWO YEARS time but...


1. Why is the DFE asking me to be an early adopter of the early years reforms? 

2. Why is the Local Authority bribing me to sign up and saying I will be exempt from moderation if I do as though that would be a good thing?

3. Why is an Ofsted representative sharing the link for me to join now!? 

4. WHY ON EARTH is Ruth Miskin (of RWI phonics programme) emailing me to “get in first’? 


Has the world gone mad? 


The real questions to ask ourselves are:


1. WHY oh WHY would we risk de-skilling our staff by asking them to teach a different programme of study/curriculum to what we are teaching now OR will be teaching in two years time?!?!?! 


2. We will be exempt from moderation only because they will not know HOW to moderate us!? 


3. What about the children while we test out more curriculum reforms? Such risk of weaker cohorts since their early adopter curriculum is not supported by guidance, a framework,  exemplification or evidence? 


Do they think we are daft?

Do you have the answers? 



Write a comment


  • Shahina Khan (Sunday, February 09 20 09:13 pm GMT)

    Hi as an Early Years skilful professional why should I be an adopter I should be given the responsibility to be a reformer
    The children don’t need a new curriculum. Early years don’t need to new curriculum they need to be seen and affirm as curriculum makers/creators ITMP
    The Ofsted inspector should highly qualified in only Early years field so they inspect from the same perspective
    My biggest concern is that Early years staff hasn’t understood the curriculum fully and how come they will understand the new one and how long this will take

  • Helen Moylett (Sunday, February 09 20 10:48 pm GMT)

    Put children first! These so called ‘reforms’ are an injustice being perpetrated on children, families and EY practitioners. The primary assessment consultation has been used as a vehicle to re-write the all early learning goals supposedly to make the EYFSP a lighter workload. There is no evidence this was asked for. DfE has also re-written the areas of learning although they were not included in the consultation and thus they have changed the entire EYFS without anyone’s consent. All of it is about trying to align EYFS more closely with Y1 and builds on Ofsted’s Bold Beginnings. Ruth Miskin is selling her wares because DfE and Ofsted have encouraged commercial phonics schemes. Resist and encourage your HT to do the same. The LA is shooting itself in its already very weakened foot if it encourages early adoption via bribery or any other way.

Please enter the code
* Required fields